Our 44th President now claims to be a “free speech absolutist” but almost in the same breath, he goes on to advocate straight-up censorship and regulation of what he deems to be “dangerous” speech.
It’s probably verboten to ask this question but, who gets to decide what speech is “dangerous?”
Well, he does of course!
It’s true! He’s a “free speech absolutist” –for himself and those who agree with him. Not for anyone else.
Who’s still buying this Brave New World he’s trying to hoist upon us?
Is that a dangerous question?